Peladn HA-4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemPeladn HA-4  (all builds)
MotherboardPELADN HA-4
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 20:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 73.2
1-Core 194
2-Core 385
112% 217 Pts
4-Core 723
8-Core 1,280
121% 1,001 Pts
64-Core 1,477
91% 1,477 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.6% Average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 69.3
37% 42.4 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 83
47% 53.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PELADN 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3841 1195 383 386 383 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,679
Write 4,171
Mixed 2,945
SusWrite 1,095
615% 2,722 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 78.2
252% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,557
DQ Write 826
DQ Mixed 1,372
972% 1,252 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 306%
Great: 309%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 32.4
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELF109 DELL SE2419HX
Typical HA-4 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Peladn HA-4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback