Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-R R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 14:06
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 614
70% 546 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.8% Good
Lighting 86.4
Reflection 85.9
Parallax 73.8
70% 82 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 68.9
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,322
Write 5412
Mixed 5,572
1,286% 5,768 MB/s
4K Read 274
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 207
777% 221 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 555
DQ Mixed 632
507% 722 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
234GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 175 176 177 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 72.1
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 175
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron AFLD48EH1P 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 19.8
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27.9" 1280 720 BNQ7949 BenQ EL2870U
Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback