Lenovo 21FWS1T700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21FWS1T700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21FWS1T700
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 10:18
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 183
2-Core 347
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 1,076
106% 865 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 113%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A1000 6GB Laptop GPU
Legend(17AA 2316) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 529.13
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 64.7
50% 65.1 fps
MRender 49.2
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 58.2
44% 53.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 67%
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 2316) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 26.5
19% 25.4 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 21.5
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg8aznv512g LA KIOXIA 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5106APLA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,226
Write 2,137
Mixed 1,848
462% 2,070 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 75.9
251% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 696
500% 659 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 299%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CWMOL 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 32.5
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 23.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 165 34.1" 1280 720 DELA185 DELL U3421WE
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback