Casper NIRVANA NB X500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB X500  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NL51CU 001
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 22:50
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 184
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 319
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 40C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 52 68 50 117 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 428
Write 356
Mixed 332
SusWrite 92.4
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 88.4
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 27
63% 125 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.6% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0812
Typical NIRVANA NB X500 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB X500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback