Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211203
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 20:20
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$240
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 205
2-Core 398
121% 230 Pts
4-Core 771
8-Core 1,466
133% 1,119 Pts
64-Core 2,362
146% 2,362 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
HP(103C 88D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 212
Parallax 201
180% 211 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 150
Splatting 134
128% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 203 165 145 137 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 409
Mixed 364
SusWrite 181
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 44.9
169% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 326
249% 337 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
194GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 464 476 482 485 483 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 449
Mixed 429
SusWrite 467
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 46.7
156% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 340
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Intenso SCSI 1TB
131GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 116 112 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 87
Write 61
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 115
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
191% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 77%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
604GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 79.5
Write 80.8
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 87.5
94% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
115GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 65 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 67
Write 71.4
Mixed 31
SusWrite 64.1
78% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4R.M16FE1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 35.6
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 44.3
SC Mixed 32.2
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,426
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback