Lenovo 82SA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82SA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 16:34
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 62.2
1-Core 169
2-Core 338
97% 190 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 860
88% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,222
76% 1,222 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3AF6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
68.7% Good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 117
Parallax 81
75% 96.8 fps
MRender 76.2
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 61.6
56% 69 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 72%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AF6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 22.3
16% 21.3 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 16.3
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW010TZL 1TB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C01C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 48 33 32 512 175 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,982
Write 1,324
Mixed 903
SusWrite 142
240% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 33.4
134% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 92.2
125% 245 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 143%
Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 28.2
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 20.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 165 25.2" 1280 720 AUS24D2 ASUS VA247
Typical 82SA Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82SA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback