Valve Jupiter

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemValve Jupiter  (all builds)
MotherboardValve Jupiter
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 16:21
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Custom APU 0405
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 50.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 198
64% 119 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 484
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Custom GPU 0405
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.10.20.01
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 34.1
16% 26.3 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 28.3
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM3PDP3512B-A01 512GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,088
Write 996
Mixed 911
223% 998 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 47.2
155% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 655
467% 606 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 196%
SDXC 1TB
233GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 14 13 13 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.9% Very poor
Read 56.7
Write 13.2
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 12.1
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K3LK7K70BM-BGCP000 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 28.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 0R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 9% 67 211 59 75 27" 1280 720 JRY3200 VGA
Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback