MSI MAG B560M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D17)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D17
MotherboardMSI MAG B560M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D17)  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210331
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 14:58
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 209
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 594
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 63.9
50% 50.4 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 58.3
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,556
Write 1,110
Mixed 1,446
305% 1,371 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 49.5
178% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 712
531% 711 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
3GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 415
Mixed 360
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 43.1
140% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 350
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 500GB
338GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 329
Write 345
Mixed 317
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 21.4
70% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 146
111% 148 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 101%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
473GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 70.2
Write 68.9
Mixed 51.9
48% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0F9D C27R502
Typical MAG B560M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D17) Builds (Compare 1,976 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7D17)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $472
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback