Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 04:47
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 924
84% 705 Pts
64-Core 2,067
128% 2,067 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 291
Parallax 360
256% 322 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 257
Splatting 188
208% 265 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 212%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU720 1TB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190429a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 22 58 39 64 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 444
Write 196
Mixed 221
SusWrite 48.8
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 32.3
95% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 59.8
DQ Mixed 73.6
71% 117 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 105%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2040 2106 2294 2218 2226 1877 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,076
Write 2,168
Mixed 2,238
SusWrite 2,127
486% 2,152 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 50.2
176% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 804
DQ Mixed 974
721% 958 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 309%
Great: 526%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
331GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 416 413 411 413 377 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 417
Mixed 411
SusWrite 406
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 43.1
138% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 210
158% 213 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96%
Great: 130%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 164 162 162 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 112
Mixed 107
SusWrite 162
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 29.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 22.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 3R 4G 14B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 13 193 10 170 26.9" 2560 1377 GBT270D M27Q
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $969
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback