Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 220%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 211%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '24 at 22:33
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$196
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 201
2-Core 390
117% 225 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 1,172
118% 956 Pts
64-Core 1,437
89% 1,437 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 110%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 271
Parallax 291
237% 284 fps
MRender 368
Gravity 248
Splatting 193
212% 270 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 203%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1431 1434 1412 719 1184 919 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,609
Write 1,271
Mixed 1,195
SusWrite 1,183
295% 1,315 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 64
222% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 349
403% 685 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 243%
Great: 277%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
232GB free
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 1047 513 233 224 219 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,179
Write 1,028
Mixed 1,072
SusWrite 547
215% 956 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 63.6
227% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 793
641% 893 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 193%
Great: 228%
XF-1TB 1TB
639GB free
Firmware: 0629479F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2425 1283 374 365 364 384 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,364
Write 2,308
Mixed 1,840
SusWrite 866
413% 1,845 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 58.8
195% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,588
DQ Write 1,971
DQ Mixed 1,418
1,170% 1,659 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 287%
Great: 407%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 104 104 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 138
Write 108
Mixed 99
SusWrite 104
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.6
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
162% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 68.9
MC Mixed 57.6
168% 58.8 GB/s
SC Read 42.8
SC Write 63.6
SC Mixed 52.9
152% 53.1 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 162%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 22 100 27" 1280 720 CMT2706 GA271
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $960
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback