Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateJan 28 '24 at 01:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 57.5
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 217
65% 122 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 409
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 411
26% 411 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 13
Parallax 20.6
12% 15.9 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 13.9
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 700 1TB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0620A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 1210 1130 1268 913 417 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1644
Write 1,398
Mixed 1,084
SusWrite 996
287% 1,281 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 23.2
112% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 398
292% 385 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 177%
Great: 283%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
124GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 160 160 163 162 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 161
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 32" 1280 720 BBY0019 LCDTV
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback