Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 21:10
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$284
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 77.3
1-Core 131
2-Core 267
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 792
80% 648 Pts
64-Core 1075
66% 1075 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 37D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.4% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 67.2
57% 66.6 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 54.4
58% 74.3 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 293 282 297 293 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 368
Write 296
Mixed 215
SusWrite 292
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 29.3
100% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 232
201% 299 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 129%
Nvme KINGSTON SNV2S1000G 1TB
672GB free
Firmware: ELFK0S.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1061 1013 1153 1148 1100 1088 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,066
Write 1,168
Mixed 1,029
SusWrite 1,094
246% 1,089 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 50
158% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 550
DQ Mixed 643
500% 695 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 191%
Great: 341%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$85
21GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 109 111 114 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 97.8
Write 110
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 114
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
50GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 40 37 28 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 37.3
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 35.6
50% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 6.2
470% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 22.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 10% 68 204 42 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM776F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,411
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $285Nvidia RTX 4060 $285Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12400F $149Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4070 $530Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $346SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback