Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZM_FX707ZM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZM_FX707ZM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX707ZM
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 17:32
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 172
2-Core 327
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 932
88% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,466
91% 1,466 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1D3C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 29
20% 28 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 1.2
15% 21.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1D3C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.3% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 115
Parallax 108
92% 112 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 87.7
Splatting 80
79% 99.4 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 105 111 106 110 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,803
Write 628
Mixed 195
SusWrite 153
150% 695 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 55.7
184% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 434
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 141
136% 224 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 151%
Great: 297%
Nvme TS256GMTE112S 256GB
96GB free
Firmware: U0513A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 275 162 538 339 557 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
Read 1,298
Write 878
Mixed 753
SusWrite 390
184% 830 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 15.5
96% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 308
231% 309 MB/s
Jmicron Generic 1TB
254GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 332 346 340 323 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 344
Write 354
Mixed 327
SusWrite 336
77% 340 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 29
92% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 162
123% 166 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 86%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
14GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.3 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 257
Write 19.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 8.8
57% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
46% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 45.6
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 123%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUO4B9D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZM_FX707ZM Builds (Compare 379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX707ZM_FX707ZM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback