HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C30
Memory14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230621
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 00:21
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 87
45% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 640
68% 542 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8C30) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.60
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 37.9
16% 26.9 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 21.3
17% 20.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 939
Write 649
Mixed 746
173% 778 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 51.9
182% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 703
478% 601 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905790-092.A00G Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 24GB
4800, 5600 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 39.9
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 25
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE094D
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb1xxx Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback