Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics170% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '24 at 00:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$210
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 206
2-Core 403
123% 233 Pts
4-Core 794
8-Core 1,463
135% 1,129 Pts
64-Core 2,322
144% 2,322 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Lighting 257
Reflection 223
Parallax 218
210% 233 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 164
Splatting 134
146% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 170%
Great: 170%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 353 357 296 295 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 328
Mixed 292
SusWrite 323
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 43.6
175% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 268
219% 312 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3000C15-8GVGB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 33.5
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 29.3
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 21% 19 170 3 60 34" 1280 720 AUS3435 ASUS VG34V
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback