Acer Aspire TC-710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-710
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 15:55
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 548
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Sapphire(174B 1325) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 22.5
12% 20.7 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 22.2
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hajaan HS256E 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 365 370 391 388 237 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 13.4
Write 225
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 352
36% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 19.5
60% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 32.6
81% 166 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-MCN ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 28.6" 1280 720 SAM1016 LU28R55
Typical Aspire TC-710 Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback