MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A71
MotherboardMSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71)  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 14:29
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.5% Poor
Memory 40.6
1-Core 24.4
2-Core 47.8
24% 37.6 Pts
4-Core 71.7
8-Core 79
10% 75.3 Pts
64-Core 75
5% 75 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 108
Parallax 73.1
57% 83.6 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 67.2
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 115 105 106 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41% Average
Read 358
Write 168
Mixed 197
SusWrite 114
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 9.5
50% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 28.5
45% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41%
Great: 70%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 157GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 72.1
Write 64
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 22.2
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 45%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 158GB
147GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 22 20 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 78.3
Write 72.5
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 22
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GB-$30
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 18
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 17 60 23.5" 1920 1017 BNQ7F02 BenQ XL2410T
Typical Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) Builds (Compare 6,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) - $114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $706
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback