HC HCAR5000-MI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemHC HCAR5000-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR5000-MI
Memory9.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230621
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 12:46
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 169
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 463
43% 356 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Airdisk 512GB SSD 512GB
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0808A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,368
Write 1,252
Mixed 903
261% 1,174 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 19.5
85% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 571
DQ Write 481
DQ Mixed 497
380% 516 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 268%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
64GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 144
Mixed 21.2
120% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 54%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
13GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 16.2
Write 1.5
7% 8.85 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
61% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4S16G32C22ST 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 9% 22 96 44 60 0" 1920 1057
Typical HCAR5000-MI Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HC HCAR5000-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback