Fujitsu CELSIUS W410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W410 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120124
Uptime	8.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '24 at 11:40
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 167 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 324 41% 311 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Dell(1028 2120) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.09.06 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 13.5 0% 7.53 fps	MRender 8.4 Gravity 9.2 Splatting 8.3 7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 2.56% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: KF100-06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 40 41 44 40 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 76.9 Write 71 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 40.7 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 53%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$53 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 28GB free Firmware: 0002CE02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 64 63 63 57 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 63.3 Write 62 Mixed 37.6 SusWrite 59.2 41% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 43%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB 5,568 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 242GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 106 106 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 114 Write 100 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 106 72% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston 9905584-014.A00LF M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.3% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 8 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	54	33	60	21.5"	1280 720	LEN61C9 LEN S22e-19

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W410 Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W410

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	65x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	54x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	16x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	3x
9905584-023.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 54%, 166 samples	3x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 3,379 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $274

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16