Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 84 2-Core 174 65% 112 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 650 58% 489 Pts	64-Core 819 51% 819 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kodak X120 PRO 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 297GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 132 60 76 46 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 451 Write 404 Mixed 387 SusWrite 136 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 24.3 104% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 48.7 96% 189 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 421GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 135 139 143 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 121 Write 137 Mixed 115 SusWrite 143 96% 129 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (86^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64% Good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 21 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 19.1 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	51	21	144	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16