Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 22:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 6-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 70
1-Core 135
2-Core 276
85% 160 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 822
77% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 186
Parallax 210
101% 173 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 137
Splatting 83.8
87% 110 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX500-512-80-G2 512GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMG1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 309 318 320 323 323 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,103
Write 321
Mixed 410
SusWrite 318
118% 538 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 44
214% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 445
386% 592 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 157%
Great: 253%
Kodak X120 PRO 512GB
106GB free
Firmware: SN11021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 436 437 447 449 445 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 487
Mixed 444
SusWrite 450
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 48.9
181% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 307
225% 292 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IRP3600D4V64L18S/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 25.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 GSM57DF E2260
Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback