MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive462% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 07:29
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 335
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 907
92% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 202
Parallax 192
170% 201 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 148
Splatting 130
126% 157 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 144%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 2TB
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3928 2852 4098 4252 4275 3945 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
462% Outstanding
Read 2,404
Write 4,392
Mixed 2,686
SusWrite 3,892
761% 3,343 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 85.5
281% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 1315
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 551
503% 792 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 462%
Great: 625%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 442 446 475 461 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 478
Mixed 387
SusWrite 458
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 47.4
161% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 183
180% 288 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 113%
Great: 118%
Seagate BarraCuda Q5 ZP1000CV30001 1TB
484GB free
Firmware: SU5SH017
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1556 1574 157 90 95 588 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,157
Write 1,641
Mixed 1,241
SusWrite 677
266% 1,179 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 69.8
236% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 543
DQ Mixed 722
513% 656 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 189%
Great: 270%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 173 174 172 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 162
Mixed 72
SusWrite 174
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
791GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 84.8
Write 89.6
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 109
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C16 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39.2
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 32
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 36.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 120 27" 1280 720 HPN3945 OMEN 27q
Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 9,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback