Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 14:50
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 158
2-Core 316
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 1,011
100% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37BB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 342
Parallax 252
183% 273 fps
MRender 284
Gravity 237
Splatting 184
187% 235 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 167%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,456
Write 1,983
Mixed 1,825
464% 2,088 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 93.6
322% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,516
DQ Write 1,006
DQ Mixed 1,169
897% 1,231 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
16GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,769
Write 1,634
Mixed 1,288
348% 1,564 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 95.2
326% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 1,130
DQ Mixed 422
504% 872 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 311%
WD WD3200BUCT-63TWBY0 320GB
28GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 55.2
Write 60.4
Mixed 44
SusWrite 36.9
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 47%
WD WD3200BUCT-63TWBY0 320GB
16GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 44.4
Write 46.8
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 47
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 47%
WD WD3200BUCT-63TWBY0 320GB
1GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.2
Write 35.3
Mixed 29.9
25% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 47%
Samsung External HDD 500GB
113GB free, PID 344b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 92 93 92 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 98.1
Write 104
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 91.8
116% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 47%
Samsung External HDD 500GB
32GB free, PID 344b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 70 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 75.7
Write 78.3
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 69.6
90% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 39.5
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 50.8
SC Mixed 34
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 49.4
81% 49.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 124%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 3R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 27% 51 218 60 60 23" 1920 1009 ACR025D V223HQV
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,046
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback