Asrock H310CM-IB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-IB  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 23:06
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$289
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 184
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 373
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 101
Parallax 92.2
84% 98.6 fps
MRender 99.6
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 79.6
73% 90.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 404
Write 332
Mixed 226
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 15.6
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 87.3
DQ Mixed 43
48% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
748GB free
Firmware: CS900Y13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 390
Write 387
Mixed 335
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 28.4
111% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 211
181% 264 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
572GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 170
Write 157
Mixed 103
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48.2
Write 108
Mixed 74.2
58% 77 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
174% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.3
Write 120
Mixed 74.4
71% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
180% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D12.2324CS.001 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 11 100 24" 1280 720 ACR0472 Acer XF240H
Typical H310CM-IB Builds (Compare 960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-IB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $290
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback