Gigabyte GA-B760M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive406% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '24 at 19:55
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 173
2-Core 307
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 990
94% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
MSI(1462 5172) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 197
Parallax 203
170% 203 fps
MRender 262
Gravity 164
Splatting 123
143% 183 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 149%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-2000GM 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 31060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1993 2209 2285 2388 2455 2292 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 2,569
Write 2,395
Mixed 1,592
SusWrite 2,270
496% 2,207 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 89.4
322% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,719
DQ Write 1,243
DQ Mixed 1,369
1,053% 1,444 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 406%
Great: 446%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Golden Empire CL38-40-40 D5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
167% Outstanding
MC Read 66.7
MC Write 68.9
MC Mixed 61.2
188% 65.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 30.9
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 167%
Great: 196%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23.8" 1280 720 SAM729F S24R35A
Typical GA-B760M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 306%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,000
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback