Arcelik OPT58GSFF11-SKUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemArcelik OPT58GSFF11-SKUK  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '24 at 11:55
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 141
60% 99 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 201
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 842A) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 20
12% 17.1 fps
MRender 18.5
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 14.4
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 116 120 121 118 117 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.7% Average
Read 279
Write 245
Mixed 184
SusWrite 140
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 22.1
75% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 46.3
39% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG Kingston 99U5471-051.A00LF NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.2% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000
Typical OPT58GSFF11-SKUK Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Arcelik OPT58GSFF11-SKUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback