Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090831
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 19:03
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 77
42% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 139
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
AMD(1002 00D0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 19
17% 20.3 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 11.7
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 147 152 160 162 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.9% Average
Read 217
Write 170
Mixed 185
SusWrite 153
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 18.6
72% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 35.8
DQ Write 44.7
DQ Mixed 37.2
29% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 100%
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
52GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 85 87 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 223
Write 146
Mixed 149
SusWrite 82.4
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 14.3
62% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 27.7
23% 33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 86%
WD WD1600LB-55EDA0 160GB
32GB free
Firmware: 15.05R15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 29.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 29.1
20% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 28%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
258GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 79 85 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 94.7
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 82
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
422GB free
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 141 145 149 151 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 182
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 146
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 60 23.5" 1280 720 DELD08D DELL SE2417HG
Typical GA-EP45-UD3LR Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback