Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090831
Uptime18.4 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 17:52
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 61
1-Core 26.3
2-Core 52
32% 46.4 Pts
4-Core 66.9
8-Core 91.7
10% 79.3 Pts
64-Core 84
5% 84 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
AMD(1002 00D0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 18.6
16% 19.3 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 11.6
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 114 119 115 122 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.2% Below average
Read 184
Write 147
Mixed 145
SusWrite 115
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 12.8
51% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 27.9
DQ Mixed 34.6
25% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 100%
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
50GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 68 70 72 73 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.5% Poor
Read 165
Write 107
Mixed 112
SusWrite 69.8
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 10.6
45% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 26.6
20% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 86%
WD WD1600LB-55EDA0 160GB
32GB free
Firmware: 15.05R15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 28.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 28.2
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 28%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
258GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 69 71 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 92.3
Write 95.7
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 69.2
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
422GB free
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 111 111 114 118 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 152
Write 129
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 111
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 36 60 23.5" 1280 720 DELD08D DELL SE2417HG
Typical GA-EP45-UD3LR Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback