Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230531
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 18:34
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 260
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 878
84% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,204
74% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 205
Parallax 197
176% 206 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 149
Splatting 132
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 148%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 424
Write 244
Mixed 144
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 14
49% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 96.3
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 41.3
44% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: V9001c01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 581 577 578 582 583 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,101
Write 586
Mixed 603
SusWrite 580
160% 718 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 54.6
214% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 295
249% 352 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 162%
Great: 197%
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
35GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 225 200 217 220 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 354
Write 426
Mixed 338
SusWrite 212
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 49.6
172% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 266
217% 311 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 105%
Toshiba HDWT740 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: KQ0K0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 159 160 158 159 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 167
Mixed 103
SusWrite 157
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
124GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 124 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 165
Write 165
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 123
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2E3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 25.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 27.1
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 65%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 38.5" 1280 720 IPS2418 GT24R18
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback