Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 15:44
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 721
70% 574 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 64.6
52% 67 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 56.7
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
468GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 431 439 454 451 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 470
Mixed 447
SusWrite 429
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 48.7
157% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 288
236% 336 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 111%
Great: 137%
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60
128GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1185 1416 704 378 321 418 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,052
Write 1,457
Mixed 1,202
SusWrite 737
303% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 62.6
198% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 585
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 522
383% 504 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 211%
Great: 333%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
118GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 98 97 98 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 83.2
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 96.1
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
424GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 128 130 130 131 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69% Good
Read 113
Write 127
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 128
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69%
Great: 88%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 34 34 34 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 53.7
Write 33.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 33.1
47% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
58% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.9% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 26
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 22.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $730
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback