Lenovo 4352G9U

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 4352G9U (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '24 at 14:16
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0 2,020 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 77.4 2-Core 150 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 274 37% 275 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2871) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 25 Parallax 31.7 18% 26.3 fps	MRender 31.9 Gravity 29.5 Splatting 25.3 23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$195 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 406 418 458 459 447 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 440 Mixed 383 SusWrite 420 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 30.8 105% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 356 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 124%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 504GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 108 110 113 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 102 Write 88.7 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 110 68% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF51272PZ- 4x4GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.6% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 21.8 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 9.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	27"	1280 720	DEL40BD DELL P2715Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4352G9U Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4352G9U

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	9x
Xeon E5-1607 0IntelBench 62%, 2,020 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	3x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
512GB 512GBExramBench 95%, 71 samples	3x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C 8JTF51264AZ-1 Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C CT25664BA1339 Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C 16GBMicronBench 58%, 2 samples	2x
TS512MKR72V6N 4x4GBTranscendBench 94%, 2 samples	2x
HMT41GR7AFR4C 4x8GBHynixBench 88%, 46 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16