Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 09:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700F
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 69.9
1-Core 157
2-Core 306
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,138
104% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,139
70% 1,139 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 294
Parallax 216
174% 241 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 170
Splatting 130
156% 201 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 155%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 710 1TB
746GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2SAD01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 1288 1483 1421 194 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,994
Write 1525
Mixed 1,357
SusWrite 866
321% 1,435 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 55.8
199% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 980
DQ Mixed 758
636% 921 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 238%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD432G32002 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 24" 1920 1057 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical H510M-HDV/M.2 SE Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback