Asrock X99 Extreme6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 19:21
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 183
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 754
66% 564 Pts
64-Core 1,548
96% 1,548 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 160
Parallax 370
132% 231 fps
MRender 284
Gravity 123
Splatting 191
161% 199 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 134%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,316
Write 1,882
Mixed 962
380% 1,720 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 55.7
184% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 517
378% 500 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$96
2TB free
Firmware: ACF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 177
Write 165
Mixed 31.9
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 108%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: G00A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 173
Mixed 105
114% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 103%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: A5F0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 169
Write 174
Mixed 87.2
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 92%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
187GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 54.7
Mixed 68.4
96% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.5
134% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 40.7
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20.6
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 115%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 27" 1280 720 HPN3964 OMEN 27qs
Typical X99 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback