Datalogic H81M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDatalogic H81M-S2V  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-S2V
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141218
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 18:52
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 162
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 276
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 3%
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1275 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 38.9
23% 32 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 23.6
23% 28.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 216 166 207 200 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 383
Write 269
Mixed 205
SusWrite 194
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 36.3
119% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.2
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 47.2
43% 63 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
381GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 112
Write 117
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 113
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-041.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 LEN66BE L27e-30
Typical H81M-S2V Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Datalogic H81M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $64
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback