Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 01:55
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 156
2-Core 317
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 968
94% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,388
86% 1,388 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Gigabyte(1458 4113) ≥ 4GB; gv-n406taero oc-16gd
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 191
Parallax 206
173% 203 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 164
Splatting 122
141% 181 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 150%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 286 337 345 338 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 480
Write 348
Mixed 232
SusWrite 329
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 21
105% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 244
203% 295 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 115%
WDBRPG0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
267GB free
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1798 1735 1738 1735 1742 1132 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 1,994
Write 2,048
Mixed 1,783
SusWrite 1,647
421% 1,868 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 57.9
186% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,089
DQ Write 707
DQ Mixed 982
710% 926 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 278%
Great: 349%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
714GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 135 137 133 139 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 72.3
Write 55.3
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 135
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
801GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 187 200 178 190 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 192
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 190
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
304% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 161 167 156 149 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 126
Write 148
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 160
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 77 72 68 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 130
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 72.9
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
273% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 44.9
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 33.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 27" 1280 720 MSI3CB5 MSI G271
Typical PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $558
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback