ECS H81H3-M4

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	ECS H81H3-M4 (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140513
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '24 at 05:07
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 168 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 303 40% 302 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% EVGA(3842 1521) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 3 Parallax 0.8 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKZ1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 236 229 237 238 238 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.9% Below average	Read 150 Write 63.7 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 234 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 9.1 39% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 11.9 DQ Write 23.5 DQ Mixed 109 57% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 236GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 94 94 96 94 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 82.8 Write 86.5 Mixed 59 SusWrite 94 59% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F641GU67F1600G 1x8GB 191 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.7 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	0	16.8"	1280 720	SAM0286 SyncMaster

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81H3-M4 Builds (Compare 993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M4

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	97x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	94x
Core i3-4130Intel $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	74x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	177x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	137x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	121x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
SSD 120GBLonglineBench 65%, 271 samples	25x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	24x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	25x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	20x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16