HP 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemHP 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 885F
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '24 at 03:23
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 236
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 454
39% 336 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
Sapphire(1DA2 E458) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 85.2
36% 64.2 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 46
Splatting 27.1
44% 58.2 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1114 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 187 187 187 197 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 846
Write 200
Mixed 375
SusWrite 190
88% 403 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 45.7
132% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 163
172% 292 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 103%
Great: 177%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
445GB free
Firmware: 03200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 354 304 73 70 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 424
Write 370
Mixed 310
SusWrite 203
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 30.3
100% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 125
102% 144 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GU6CJR6N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G5 Small Form Factor PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 128% - Outstanding Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback