Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 529%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 132%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 705%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 137%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics408% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive848% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO  (all builds)
Memory84.8 GB free of 96 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '24 at 00:56
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$499
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 246
2-Core 492
143% 278 Pts
4-Core 954
8-Core 1,857
166% 1,405 Pts
64-Core 4,524
280% 4,524 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
408% Outstanding
Lighting 664
Reflection 587
Parallax 787
541% 679 fps
MRender 540
Gravity 580
Splatting 313
374% 477 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 408%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000T700SSD3 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5897 6352 6508 7051 7144 7135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
848% Outstanding
Read 6,744
Write 6,712
Mixed 3,424
SusWrite 6,681
1,324% 5,890 MB/s
4K Read 78.3
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 117
382% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,329
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 1,185
879% 1,168 MB/s
Poor: 381%
This bench: 848%
Great: 999%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$326
3TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3217 3226 3628 3612 3632 3656 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
491% Outstanding
Read 3,049
Write 4,221
Mixed 2,264
SusWrite 3,495
737% 3,257 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 99.3
322% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,396
DQ Write 1093
DQ Mixed 1,243
930% 1,244 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 491%
Great: 616%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$326
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3230 3327 4231 4269 4247 3758 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
517% Outstanding
Read 3,041
Write 4,378
Mixed 2,357
SusWrite 3,844
771% 3,405 MB/s
4K Read 81.1
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 107
333% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,419
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,270
949% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 517%
Great: 616%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
18.5TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 271 264 271 263 264 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
44% Average
Read 265
Write 233
Mixed 154
SusWrite 266
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 1.2
62% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 4.3
DQ Write 21.1
DQ Mixed 2.3
5% 9.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX CMP96GX5M2B6400C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
229% Outstanding
MC Read 91.5
MC Write 92.9
MC Mixed 88.4
260% 90.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 54.5
SC Mixed 42.6
117% 41.1 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 229%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34.1" 1280 720 ACI3433 ROG PG348Q
Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO Builds (Compare 510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 460%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 611%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback