Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 531%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 133%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 704%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 138%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics405% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive855% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO  (all builds)
Memory86.2 GB free of 96 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 23:33
Run Duration355 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$499
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 245
2-Core 492
143% 278 Pts
4-Core 967
8-Core 1,873
168% 1,420 Pts
64-Core 4,528
280% 4,528 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 138%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
405% Outstanding
Lighting 663
Reflection 591
Parallax 786
541% 680 fps
MRender 541
Gravity 579
Splatting 276
362% 465 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 405%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000T700SSD3 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5561 6235 6364 7112 7176 7182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
855% Outstanding
Read 6,883
Write 6,894
Mixed 3,374
SusWrite 6,605
1,335% 5,939 MB/s
4K Read 83.9
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 120
400% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,345
DQ Write 994
DQ Mixed 1,214
895% 1,184 MB/s
Poor: 381%
This bench: 855%
Great: 999%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$326
3TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2662 3064 3937 4303 4329 4181 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
484% Outstanding
Read 2,487
Write 3,794
Mixed 2,111
SusWrite 3,746
688% 3,034 MB/s
4K Read 74.1
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 100
319% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1410
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 1,256
942% 1,261 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 484%
Great: 616%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$326
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2909 3370 3902 3889 3817 3847 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
480% Outstanding
Read 2,536
Write 3,794
Mixed 2,061
SusWrite 3,622
681% 3,004 MB/s
4K Read 75.5
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 102
325% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,408
DQ Write 1102
DQ Mixed 1,258
941% 1,256 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 480%
Great: 616%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
18.5TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 271 263 270 263 267 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 265
Write 259
Mixed 136
SusWrite 266
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 0.4
69% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 4
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 0.4
3% 6.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX CMP96GX5M2B6400C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
229% Outstanding
MC Read 89.4
MC Write 93.5
MC Mixed 87.9
258% 90.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.7
SC Write 56.2
SC Mixed 43.3
124% 43.4 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 229%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34.1" 1280 720 ACI3433 ROG PG348Q
Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO Builds (Compare 510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 460%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 611%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback