Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 20:54
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 170
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 474
51% 407 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 336A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 131
Parallax 134
112% 134 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 143
Splatting 120
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 236 279 283 281 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 374
Mixed 369
SusWrite 278
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 38.5
135% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 341
256% 341 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
261GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 982 842 1222 1235 1116 1125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,953
Write 1,624
Mixed 1,407
SusWrite 1,087
340% 1,518 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 52.8
177% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 683
474% 596 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 224%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 89 111 112 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 68
SusWrite 97
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
308GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 103 142 138 151 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 132
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G KHX2400C15D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15/8G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.6% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 8% 74 184 7 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $752
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback