PC OctaneVI 15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPC OctaneVI 15  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P7xxTM1
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 17:32
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 183
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 699
62% 527 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,381
Write 2,114
Mixed 1,486
443% 1,994 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 73
241% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 899
667% 884 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31100TNTD 1TB
82GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 330
Mixed 319
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 36.3
138% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 194
170% 252 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 103%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2415
Write 2,095
Mixed 1550
449% 2,020 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 74.9
247% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 986
732% 970 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
778GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 9,153
Mixed 68.7
3,298% 4,611 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0
48% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 25
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 0" 1280 720
Typical OctaneVI 15 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

System: PC OctaneVI 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback