MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B18
MotherboardMSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190326
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 17:05
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 268
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 908
88% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,005
62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
Asus(1043 04F2) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
166% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 229
Parallax 441
165% 291 fps
MRender 383
Gravity 158
Splatting 254
214% 265 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 166%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1458 826 830 839 838 844 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,518
Write 1,696
Mixed 1269
SusWrite 939
305% 1,355 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 61.4
217% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,371
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,174
878% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 237%
Great: 269%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
198GB free
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1261 374 373 379 370 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,434
Write 1,825
Mixed 1,391
SusWrite 523
291% 1,293 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 67.1
232% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 1,070
737% 911 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 198%
Great: 276%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
33GB free
Firmware: P22OA92A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 56 54 55 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 39.8
Mixed 26
SusWrite 54.8
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
522GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 209 202 213 213 214 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 95.1
Write 77.3
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 209
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
61% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 31.1
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 27.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 31 144 23.5" 1920 1080 MSI3BA0 MSI G24C4
Typical MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) Builds (Compare 7,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) - $145

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback