Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230830
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 16:02
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$234
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 1,006
94% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,415
88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
Asus(1043 88DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.65
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 258
Reflection 246
Parallax 254
210% 253 fps
Gravity 234
Splatting 180
180% 207 fps
Poor: 162% Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1630 1437 1451 1435 1439 1448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2252
Write 2,158
Mixed 1,693
SusWrite 1,473
426% 1,894 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 76.5
250% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,217
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 1,080
810% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 306%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2000 2158 2155 2005 1509 1495 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,305
Write 2101
Mixed 1,740
SusWrite 1887
452% 2,008 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 71.5
241% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 1,174
883% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 335%
Great: 435%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
537GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1338 1193 1200 1190 1193 1177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,874
Write 1,528
Mixed 839
SusWrite 1215
305% 1,364 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 54
175% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 1,073
DQ Mixed 1,097
845% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 256%
Great: 302%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 185 187 184 187 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 164
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 186
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 108%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 171 176 175 177 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 155
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 174
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
314% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 35.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 30.4
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 60 24" 1280 720 AOC2460 2460G5
Typical ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 8,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,273
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback