Intel X99-P4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 14:11
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 135
57% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 533
48% 406 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6750
Sapphire(174B 6750) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.49% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 8.9
7% 8.47 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7.3
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 63 66 71 67 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 89
Write 103
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 65.6
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 44 60 18.5" 1280 720 AOC1970 1970W
Typical X99-P4 Builds (Compare 347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback