Machinist X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardMachinist X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220214
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 19:54
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 114
51% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 321
33% 266 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6750
Sapphire(174B 6750) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
7.95% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 9.8
9% 10.3 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 7.7
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 360 377 369 158 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 389
Write 377
Mixed 343
SusWrite 274
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 24.7
82% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 193
137% 172 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 98%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
87GB free
Firmware: JF100-22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 64 65 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 47.4
Write 65.2
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 63
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Machinist X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback