Mousecomputer B85H3-M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Mousecomputer B85H3-M4 (all builds)
Motherboard	MouseComputer B85H3-M4
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '24 at 08:20
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 42.4 1-Core 48.7 2-Core 96.8 36% 62.6 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 178 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.6% Above average	Lighting 83.6 Reflection 84.9 Parallax 73.3 68% 80.6 fps	MRender 64.1 Gravity 78.5 Splatting 0.3 34% 47.6 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 500GB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 15 6.2 7.3 6.9 8.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 67.8 Write 44.1 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 17.9 33% 44.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 35%
Ccboot iSCSI 2TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 0GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 13 5.9 7.2 6.8 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 49.7 Write 42.1 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 13.2 28% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.3 50% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	44% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.4 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	41	23	165	24"	1280 720	HAN2400 GF24FI

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85H3-M4 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Mousecomputer B85H3-M4

CPU
Core i3-4130Intel $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	4x
Core i5-4690Intel $51Bench 67%, 73,695 samples	2x
Celeron G1840Intel $69Bench 49%, 7,524 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1x

SSD
240GB 240GBMidasforceBench 64%, 426 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	1x

RAM
AM2L16BC4R1-B0PS 2x4GBAdataBench 51%, 35 samples	2x
SP004GBLTU160N02 Kingston K531R8-ETB 8GBUnknownBench 50%, 2 samples	2x
K531R8-ETB Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 6GBKingstonBench 40%, 3 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16