Acer Veriton S2660G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Veriton S2660G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton S2660G
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 05:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 533
64% 495 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Acer(1025 124E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 116 114 110 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 84.8
Write 120
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 111
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.2
58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.2
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 6.2
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 60 19.4" 1280 720 ACR0498 Acer K202HQLA
Typical Veriton S2660G Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton S2660G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback