Peladn WI-6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardPeladn WI-6  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 00:22
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 40.2
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 92
37% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 158
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 4.9
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Peladn 512GB 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 445
Write 243
Mixed 363
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 22.1
94% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 34.5
71% 141 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 70%
WD My Passport 2626 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.5
Write 29.6
Mixed 30.7
44% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 16G 3200 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5.9
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23" 1280 720 SAM079B S23A950D
Typical WI-6 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Peladn WI-6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback