Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '24 at 16:30
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 147 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 409 42% 342 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670 3,465 User benchmarks, average bench 6% AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	5.42% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 5.8 6% 6.73 fps	MRender 7.2 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 6 5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.42% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 312 193 246 238 201 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 406 Write 439 Mixed 308 SusWrite 266 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 35.5 121% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 240 200% 286 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 90GB free Firmware: V54OA7EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 50 49 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 44.9 Write 49.3 Mixed 31 SusWrite 49.1 32% 43.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 16 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	12	60	23.5"	1280 720	GSM595E M2432

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	36x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	28x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x
X3 240GBTcsunbowBench 78%, 3,491 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	6x
PSD38G13332 1x8GBPatriotBench 26%, 879 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $585

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16