Asus X705UV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X705UV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705UV
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '24 at 14:53
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 139
60% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 161
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 149E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.5
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 81 79 80 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 345
Write 85.6
Mixed 107
SusWrite 80.4
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 15.2
57% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 91.4
DQ Mixed 110
88% 127 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 92 59 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO219E
Typical X705UV Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X705UV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback